3D worlds vs. IM

There is much disparity between IM programs, and that of 3D worlds. While IM programs simply allow for conversation through text, 3D Programs are much more advanced, allowing for conversations to be carried out using animated versions of the user. The user is able to create their profile to look however they want and to to have the qualities that they wish to have, or think would be more appealing to those they wish to converse with. The 3D chatting world makes for a more 'real' experience, with users being able to actually walk over to the person they wish to chat with, and utilise body language in order to 'spark' the conversation. In comparison, while IM worlds dont allow for this kind of interaction, they do in fact allow for display pictures to be used, as well as webcam. This means that the user is able to display a photograph of themselves, so people can see what they look like. In my opinion, this is more 'real'. Others believe that the 3D world makes for a better experience, in terms of being able to physically interact with others, through the movement of their animated person. People, or 'Avatars' are also able to sexually interact with others, and some believe that again, this experience is more real, and perhaps more fulfilling, being able to see their person kissing another, rather than describing it through text, or webcam. I dont actually understand the satisfaction experienced through seeing 2 animated characters kissing on your computer screen, but apparently, some people enjoy it. 3D worlds are more like games, whereas IM programs are more like a service, allowing poeple to comminicate with friends (or strangers) online. This relates to the gaming experience, with 3D worlds being more involved, and also more time consuming, with many worlds, such as Second Life, dominating the lives of users all over the world. The 'reality' created within these worlds takes away from the reality of life itself, disallowing the distinction to be made between the two.